English Coursework

Think before you ink. I read the article with an open intellect so as not to judge. Clearly you did not postulate the similar sentiment. Within the render you obstinate to slate stains, and a variety of celebrities with them. I was surprise that you said doesnt drive it classy,attractive or wise since it was a rattling strong and unfounded doctrine. I was as app bothed by the rude and detrimental wrangle towards these mint, the things that were said roughly them were exceedingly anxious.I dont telephone back its stamp down for the article to contain much(prenominal) a negative attitude especially to these celebrities who adopt achieved great things. An opinion is one thing, scarcely judgment is an other(prenominal). Firstly when you hint stains as tree trunk graffiti its interchangeable you associate it as unlawful vandalism-let depicts the reader relish as though they argon performing an illegal or public act of crime when they get a tattoo,whereas they ar expressing themselves through a form of art. However, when you look up it as a form of art its precise hypocritical, contrasting when it isnt derogatory. Graffiti is usually described as vandalism art, which generally is all the same. This is stating that you think that all tattoos and body art are all the same and is a crime. Your opinion is incorrect and shows your lack of cognition closely tattoos. Your extremely prejudiced towards women. You slate in the main females for example Amy Whininess, Victoria Beckman, Madonna and Angelina Coli etc. You realize criticized each and e really one of these females for either their tattoos or their image.This can be proven in the subtitle when it says among celebrities such as Angelina Coli and Amy Whininess These are both females, which is presenting tattoo think its only females that have tacky tattoos and a poor image. Why not include sufficient amounts of males to females? Why respectable insult females in which are c learly successful for a modestness? It waits like your jealous of their fame, so are studying to grade them at your advantage. When you say beautiful women has been anything but smite it seems as though its your attitude of class judgment.Its an sometime(a) fashioned attitude, showing how narrow minded you are. The backchat blighted is referring to disease, which is rude,offensive, and a lexical choice. TTS a sexist response, judging women by their looks. let makes women feel perilous and negative almost themselves. They can be extremely sensitive and take things soulally which can birth galore(postnominal) issues and problems with confidence, s rapscallion esteem and so on . This could of been prevented by your attitude in your articleelf you wouldnt of been so negative towards females and tattoos many problems wouldnt be apparent.You tag a judgment that you think that tattoos are gaudy plumage of the attention seeker meaning that you think they are tacky, and brightly colored o make them more visible to others and to draw attention to themselves. You also state that peck with tattoos are desperate to be noticed on which is shown when it says last-chance barflies and aspiring as the give voice aspiring is referring to an ambition be another person in which in this case is by having a tattoo. That is totally an incorrect statement, hence not everyone with a tattoo has an incentive or desire to be on TV, and people dont aspire to aim to be on TV.Your clearly stereotyping celebrities, making them out to be attention seekers without talent. As many people hunch the rate of anorexia is increasing and more patients are worldness diagnosed with different forms of anorexia. There are many comments nearly Amy Whininesss body which will cause offence among many people but mainly anorexia sufferers. It says the ugly mark that covered her emaciated body. Firstly the comment about her tattoo being ugly is very inconsiderate, but the irrelevant and trivial comment was calling her body emaciated, since its stating she looks malnourished and abnormally thin.People dont realism how offensive it is to call someone thin ND they think aims only rude to call someone fat. They are both opposites and are very disrespectful to people. roughly people have extremely high-pitched metabolisms and cant serve well being extremely thin, so making them feel ashamed of something they cant help is misuse. Also on the other hand anorexia is a mental illness which is something that they couldnt help. specify someone whom might have this illness is the ill-use thing to do and most likely make things worse. Did you take any of the public into consideration? What are they going to think when they read this, and how this may force hem?Offending and criticizing Amy Whininess because of her weaknesses and problems is insensitive. Rape is a very sensitive topic, which many people are victims of rape. It is wrong to use rape in the wrong context, as people dont understand the severity of sexual violence. The reason its so wrong is because it causes either flashbacks of rape or brings back memories of rape or people they know who have been raped. No one should ever have to go through rape and when they try to lead about it so they can carry on living life it shouldnt be brought back up into their minds.Joking and using rape out of context shows how unretentive you are of the effect rape has on people and how immature your thought can be to be so dullard to use that to describe something you dont pit with. This can make people anxious about rape- thinking they can be raped by a dealle which clearly isnt the case, and that the action taken to get a tattoo is life changing and very violent. Using violent vocabulary to fright people to not getting tattoos isnt the right mode to approach it and will only annoy people.You try to joke about tattoos being on active five-year gray-haired which have men let undefended with a rainbow pack of sharpies. This is quite a stupid and immature thing to say. The fact you would associate tattoos being like hyperactive five year old as if they have designed and drawn the tattoos shows your undefined and negative attitude to them. You don t however, need to assault people with them as if there tattoos are bountifully drawn and not to a high quality. The fact you bring religion into the subject of tattoos is unnecessary. nigh people are extremely sensitive to things about religion so that was an extremely risky thing to bring up.Comparing tattoos and saying that Victoria Beckman thinks her tattoos are deathlike spiritual Like scented candles and Madonna albums and incorporating apparitional sarcasm is insensitive. Why canvas scented candles with Madonnas albums, that just makes you come across as stupid. Furthermore, why compare or relate any of that with tattoos? What right do you have to say Madonna body a holy war of Hindi Sanskrit, Hebrew Latin and Roman n umerals You cant mix religions and you cant associate her tattoo with a mix of different tattoos, without you knowing it by fact.This is very old school in the sense that your take different religions which go against each other. Why interrupt these religions? Why not others? Its a fundamental misconstrue of terrible atrocities in History and belittles these tropic events. This makes you seem discourteous and a condemnatory act. Think this article should be removed from media to stop animosity to people affected by rape, anorexia, insecurities etc. In succeeding(a) I dont think there should be articles with such strong negative opinions. The effect these articles have on people is huge.It leaves people with negative attitudes especially those who have suffered with mental health issues and rape. One point I didnt include was that Tattoos are also used for hue for breast surgery etc. This can be hurtful to those who have had surgery and a tattoo to correct the issue. This articl e will end up leaving innocent people feeling bad for having tattoos, and all the other rude and negative remarks. consent you see the effect of this article in another light. Im sure many people agree with me and I hope something will change from now on.